In criminal proceedings, after the court session began, the plaintiff first presented the complaint and the sequence of events. Then, it was the defendant's turn to rebut and state their differing views. After this stage concluded, the collegial panel would summarize the differing viewpoints from both sides. This focused the case on these key points. The subsequent stages of presenting evidence, cross-examination, and defense would all revolve around these focal points. This is also the greatest difference between a court proceeding and a common argument. Beyond the requirement for evidence, a court proceeding also revolves around refuting the opposing side on key points. An argument, on the other hand, can go anywhere, sometimes veering miles off-topic.
"Defendant, please continue your statement."
