"I think we need to be cautious about ruling no responsibility. The verdict must at least comply with the principle of fair responsibility."
"The principle of fair responsibility was established initially with the purpose of reflecting the law's care for the party whose interests have been harmed. A no-responsibility verdict would be far too cruel to the plaintiff."
"I still hold the same view. For our society today, balancing fairness is paramount; otherwise, public apathy will likely become even harder to curb!"
"The principle of fair responsibility has always been controversial. In my opinion, the law is not there to muddy the waters; its purpose is to assist in the better development of the nation and society..."
The seven people were extremely cautious regarding this verdict. The discussion, starting from the case itself, gradually extended to advocating for societal values, changing social attitudes, and the "principle of fair responsibility."
