It seems that those responses will all consequently become unnecessary for any other clear understanding that one cannot accept.
There are many things that exist, and they make it utterly impossible for oneself to grasp what appears to be the most proper understanding of a problem, or the response to a thought.
All of this still requires people to, at this moment, change their way of thinking or analyzing a problem.
Only then can it barely manage to present in front of people a seemingly suitable explanation or statement in response to the problem.
What kind of proper recognition or ideal clarification should one have when facing the situation safely seen by oneself?
Thus it allows for a more satisfying understanding or analysis of the problem to emerge.
Will the resulting conclusion become something that no longer requires more satisfactory answers to a problem that one cannot accept?
Perhaps it is that truth which finally appears in front of people, forcing them to see.
