The board vote concerning Vice Chairman Morgan, from start to finish, didn't take more than a few minutes because everyone knew what was going on; this so-called vote was merely a formality.
Compared to the process, everyone was eagerly awaiting the outcome.
Different voting results would naturally lead to different consequences for Morgan.
There's talk of "leniency or severity," which was concluded during the time of the old chairman, even two or three decades ago when a vice-chairman faced such a scenario.
Severity means removal from office, the group holds him accountable, and even prison time.
Leniency means demotion while retaining the position, cold treatment, and no public announcement.
It seems that the vice-chairman from decades ago wasn't as lucky as Vice Chairman Morgan, who was ultimately sent to prison and is still there now.
This caused a significant uproar at the time.
