Qiao Zei is powerful, and some things everyone can only endure, but this time it's about the livelihood of many people, really can't endure it.
So an article titled "AI replacing mentors? Let me advise you, don't get excited too early!" quickly went viral online.
The author published it anonymously but claimed to be a professor and PhD supervisor of a key discipline at a national double first-class university.
The content of the article is to analyze the pros and cons of AI replacing mentors. The advantages were naturally glossed over, while the disadvantages were thoroughly analyzed. The general idea was, students, if you work hard now, you can still have a decent job in the future.
If AI really becomes your mentor, no matter how hard you work in the future, you won't have a good job. After all, if AI replaces a professor, it means that the peak intellectual profession of humans can be challenged, so what is there that AI can't do in the future?
