As the journalist continued his inquiry, he showed no signs of stopping.
And when everyone heard his words, they immediately felt a bit puzzled.
What this guy said seems a bit off, doesn't it!
It's like he's speaking on behalf of Albert!
However, when answering journalists' questions, there must be a sequence—let the journalist finish speaking, then the respondent answers fully, and only then can the next question be asked.
So, the others didn't mind too much, perhaps this person's way of thinking is just different.
Moreover, everyone here is a colleague, and if this guy makes a fool of himself, the ones who stand to gain are actually themselves in the end.
After all, the public's eyes are sharp; everyone can clearly see who is harming those people.
