Due to the unexpected withdrawal of a candidate, the progress of the public speech had to pause for a few minutes to handle subsequent matters.
After all, carrying someone away and calming down the venue order do take time.
And after such an embarrassing example, the subsequent candidates were undoubtedly more cautious in their speeches. Although the content still seemed hollow and broad, at least it could be heard that they were all trying their best to make their expressed viewpoints appear professional and, more importantly, practical.
Even though to Perfikot, the content these guys talked about was far from reality, considering they had made an effort, she did not overly criticize.
She only asked a few follow-up questions. As long as these candidates were not the type to just babble without any actual governance experience or civil service resume, they could basically answer.
Such results also sent a signal: Perfikot did not like people without actual governance experience.
