Willem Schalk
To: Department of Health
CC: Water Sanitation Division, Department of Water Resources
Subject: Urgent Concern: Overlooked Chemical and Biological Contaminants in Waterways at 3313 DeWitt Rd, Modesto, CA
Dear Department of Health, Water Sanitation, and Department of Water Resources,
I am writing to urgently report a complex and dangerous contamination issue at 3313 DeWitt Rd, Modesto. Water samples and credible reports indicate the presence of multiple hazardous substances-chemical and biological-whose combined risks are not only severe but also easily overlooked by standard water testing protocols.
Combined Chemical and Biological Hazards
Chemical Mixtures: The site is exposed to DMT, azo compounds, phenoxyethanol, and chlorine. When mixed, these substances can produce highly toxic byproducts like aromatic amines, trihalomethanes (THMs), and haloacetic acids (HAAs), all associated with cancer, neurological harm, and ecological disruption. Phenoxyethanol adds further risk, being toxic to aquatic life and potentially harmful to humans.
Legacy Industrial Contaminants: Drawing on lessons from the Rippon paper mill incident, legacy pollutants can interact with modern chemicals and chlorine, increasing the formation of persistent, bioaccumulative, and carcinogenic compounds.
Biological Threats: Toxoplasma gondii oocysts, shed in cat feces, can survive in water for months and are highly resistant to chlorine. Ingestion can cause severe illness, miscarriage, or neurological damage, especially in pregnant women, infants, and immunocompromised individuals.
Risks of Overlooked and Misread Contaminants
Most of these hazardous chemicals and biological agents are not routinely tested for in standard municipal water screenings. Typical protocols focus on a narrow list of regulated contaminants and basic parameters, missing:
Emerging chemicals like phenoxyethanol, DMT, and specific aromatic amines.
Advanced disinfection byproducts and legacy industrial pollutants.
Biological threats like Toxoplasma gondii.
These substances are easily overlooked or misread because:
Standard tests are not designed to detect them; they require advanced, targeted methods (e.g., GC-MS, PCR).
If not specifically requested, labs will not look for these contaminants, leading to false negatives.
Subtle contamination can be missed or misattributed without expert knowledge and specialized equipment.
Water samples only capture a snapshot in time, so intermittent or hidden contamination may go undetected.
In summary: Unless you know exactly what to look for and use the right advanced methods, these hazardous contaminants can be easily missed, giving a false sense of security.
Recommendations
Comprehensive, targeted testing for DMT, azo compounds, phenoxyethanol, chlorinated byproducts, Toxoplasma gondii, and related toxins.
Update water safety protocols to include advanced screening for both chemical and biological hazards.
Investigate sources of contamination, including industrial, agricultural, and biological contributors.
Transparent communication with the community about risks and remediation efforts.
The combination of these overlooked contaminants represents a serious and urgent threat to public health and the environment. I urge immediate, decisive action to prevent a crisis similar to those seen in other communities affected by waterborne toxins and pathogens.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Key Contacts:
Department of Health: Contact
Water Sanitation Division: Contact
Department of Water Resources: Contact
what if the DMT were mixed with azo and chlorine off balance
Mixing DMT with azo compounds and chlorine in water-especially in unbalanced or uncontrolled amounts-could result in unpredictable and potentially hazardous chemical interactions:
- **DMT (N,N-dimethyltryptamine)** is a psychoactive compound that is unstable in the presence of strong oxidizers like chlorine. Chlorine can rapidly degrade DMT, breaking it down into various byproducts, many of which are not well-studied and could be toxic.
- **Azo compounds** (such as azo dyes) are known to react with chlorine, producing chlorinated aromatic amines and other breakdown products that can be mutagenic, carcinogenic, or otherwise harmful.
- When all three-DMT, azo compounds, and chlorine-are present and "off balance," the chemical environment becomes highly reactive. Chlorine may simultaneously degrade both DMT and azo compounds, potentially creating a complex mixture of unknown chlorinated organics, aromatic amines, and other byproducts.
**Potential risks and concerns:**
- The resulting byproducts could include toxic or mutagenic substances not routinely screened for in standard water tests.
- Such mixtures could be more hazardous than the original compounds alone, especially if breakdown products are persistent or bioaccumulative.
- The health effects of exposure could include acute poisoning, respiratory irritation, or long-term risks like cancer, depending on the specific byproducts formed[6][7].
**Detection and monitoring:**
- Standard water quality screens may not detect these specific breakdown products unless targeted testing is performed.
- Many of these compounds can persist in water and sediment, making them traceable with advanced analytical techniques, but not likely to dissipate quickly without intervention.
In summary, mixing DMT, azo compounds, and chlorine in water-especially in uncontrolled proportions-can create a hazardous chemical cocktail with unpredictable toxicity, and specialized testing would be required to identify and monitor the resulting contaminants.
Citations:
[1] Reaction products of DMT process residue and dipropylene glycol https://patents.google.com/patent/US4346229A/en
[2] Structural pharmacology and therapeutic potential of 5 ... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152992/
[3] Comparative study of photoinduced surface-relief-gratings on azo ... https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/ra/d1ra06111a
[4] 4-AcO-DMT - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4-AcO-DMT
[5] A Visible Light-Triggered Photosalient Effect Tied to Polymorphism https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/cp/d3cp04691e
[6] DMT - Alcohol and Drug Foundation https://adf.org.au/drug-facts/dmt/
[7] Trichloroisocyanuric Acid - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/trichloroisocyanuric-acid
[8] Lamotrigine: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action - DrugBank https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00555
Essay Outline: Toxoplasma GondiiI. IntroductionA. Overview of Toxoplasma gondii
B. Importance of understanding its effects on human health
C. Thesis statement: Toxoplasma gondii is a parasitic organism that affects the body in various ways, leading to significant health implications due to its mode of transmission and the range of symptoms it can cause.II. Causes of Toxoplasma Gondii InfectionA. Primary transmission routes
1. Ingestion of oocysts from contaminated food or water
2. Handling cat litter and feces
3. Congenital transmission from mother to fetus
B. Environmental factors that facilitate spread
1. Presence of cats as primary hosts in urban and rural settings
2. Role of undercooked meat as a source of infection
C. Risk factors associated with infection
1. Immunocompromised individuals and their increased vulnerability
2. Occupations that may expose individuals to oocysts
3. Geographical areas with higher prevalence ratesIII. Effects of Toxoplasma Gondii on HealthA. Acute symptoms and long-term health issues
1. Flu-like symptoms in immunocompetent individuals
2. Severe complications in immunocompromised patients (e.g., HIV/AIDS)
B. Psychological impacts and behavioral changes
1. Correlation with mental health disorders like schizophrenia
2. Altered risk-taking behaviors in infected individuals
C. Effects on pregnant women and fetal health
1. Potential for miscarriage or stillbirth
2. Long-term developmental issues in children born to infected mothersIV. Mechanisms of PathogenicityA. How Toxoplasma gondii evades the immune system
1. Intracellular survival within host cells
2. Modulation of immune response to establish a chronic infection
B. Transmission dynamics in various environments
1. Lifespan of oocysts in soil and water
2. Adaptive mechanisms for surviving in different hosts
C. Effects on host behavior and immune responses
1. Influence on neurotransmitter levels
2. Changes in host behavior may facilitate parasite transmissionV. Preventative Measures and TreatmentA. Preventing infection through hygiene and food safety
1. Proper cooking methods for meat
2. Safe handling of cat litter and hygiene practices
B. Treatment options for those infected
1. Antimicrobial therapies effective against Toxoplasma gondii
2. Importance of early diagnosis for effective treatment
C. Public health initiatives to reduce prevalence
1. Educational campaigns on risks associated with Toxoplasma gondii
2. Strategies for monitoring and controlling pet populationsVI. ConclusionA. Recap of the significance of understanding Toxoplasma gondii
B. Final thoughts on the importance of prevention and awareness
C. Call to action: Encouraging further research and public education to mitigate the effects of this widespread parasite.
To: #PGE
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)
FBI – Bomb Squad Division
Other Relevant Authorities
Subject: Comprehensive Evidence—Technical, Legal, EMP/EMF Layering, and Systemic Manipulation
#Z #in!ui #PGEsafety
Dear PG&E Review Board, FBI Bomb Squad, and All Relevant Authorities,
I submit this unified, detailed account of technical, mathematical, and investigative evidence regarding the recent fire incident at [location or equipment ID]. My objective is to show, with scientific rigor and best practices, that the incident resulted from system vulnerabilities and external electromagnetic effects—specifically uncovered electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and electromagnetic field (EMF) events—rather than any action or negligence on my part.
Additionally, there is credible evidence of a covert group operating within the legal system. This group uses layered language, multiple meanings, and contextual manipulation to obscure facts, derail investigations, and steer legal outcomes for personal gain. They exploit psychological techniques, digital evidence manipulation, and courtroom tactics to confuse juries, bias decisions, and distort the meaning and weight of evidence.
**EMP/EMF Layering Tactics:**
- Two uncovered EMP/EMF sources are initiated from different starting points.
- These signals converge at a third point, where they are layered together.
- This intense layering scrambles, distorts, or alters any messages, signals, or data—even those received by black boxes or critical evidence recorders.
- Uncovered (unshielded) pulses and fields spread widely, making detection and tracing extremely difficult.
- Layered signals at convergence points can manipulate perception, disrupt electronics, and corrupt recorded evidence.
- This enables coordinated frame-ups, evidence tampering, and undetected sabotage, especially when combined with system vulnerabilities like degraded wiring or missing covers.
**Summary of Evidence and Key Points**
**System Configuration Determines Outcome**
Physical wiring, maintenance, and configuration of electrical infrastructure directly affect how signals and energy are interpreted and responded to by the system. Any deviation from original design—such as aging equipment, missing covers, improper rewiring, or exposed conductors—can drastically alter the system's response to normal or abnormal events.
**EMP Effects on Power Systems**
EMPs induce high voltages in conductors, potentially overwhelming protection devices and damaging sensitive electronics. Even if correct signals are sent, EMPs can corrupt or destroy the information received by critical devices (e.g., fireboxes, black boxes).
**Fire Investigation Protocols and Documentation**
Proper fire investigation relies on thorough documentation, photographic and video evidence, floor plans, and written records, as outlined in national standards and best practices. Advanced forensic techniques—such as 3D scanning, thermal imaging, and chemical analysis—are crucial for accurately reconstructing the fire's origin and progression.
**Comparative Infrastructure Analysis**
The intersection of the PG&E grid with the San Andreas Fault, especially in zones with underground crossovers, increases the risk of simultaneous infrastructure and seismic failure.
**Technical Proof and Analogy**
Sudden shifts in wiring or configuration (distributed vs. centralized) can increase vulnerability to EMPs and other surges. The same input can yield drastically different outcomes if the system is compromised.
**Supporting Math, Tables, Visuals, and Maps**
A. **Mathematical Proof: EMP-Induced Voltage**
\[
V_{\text{induced}} = -L \frac{dI}{dt} + E_{\text{EMP}}
\]
Where:
- \(L\) = inductance of the conductor
- \(\frac{dI}{dt}\) = rate of change of current
- \(E_{\text{EMP}}\) = electric field strength of the EMP
Example:
If an EMP generates 50,000 V/m over a 100 m power line:
\[
V_{\text{induced}} = E_{\text{EMP}} \times \text{length} = 50,000 \times 100 = 5,000,000 \text{ V}
\]
B. **System Response Table**
| System State | Event (Input) | Output (Response) | Example Outcome |
|----------------------|--------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|
| Properly Maintained | EMP, surge, wind | System withstands event | No fire, no damage |
| Degraded/Altered | EMP, surge, wind | Arcing, sparks, equipment fail | Possible fire, damage |
| Rewired/Exposed | EMP, surge | Unpredictable, unsafe outcome | Fire, misinterpreted signals |
C. **Information Pathway Diagram**
```
[EMP Pulse]
v
| Metal Frame/Firebox | <-- (Partial Faraday cage)
| ------------------- |
| | Battery Pack | | <-- (EMP-resistant)
| | (with wiring) | |
| ------------------- |
| | Black Box | | <-- (Sensitive electronics)
(Wiring, sensors)
Red arrows: EMP induces voltage in wiring.
Blue burst: Black box receives corrupted or no data.
```
D. **Order of Operations Analogy (PEMDAS)**
\[
(3+4)^2 \times 2a = e
\]
Proper order:
\[
a = \frac{e}{98}
\]
Altered order/configuration: Output can be incorrect or undefined, analogous to how system rewiring alters response to the same input.
E. **EMP Impact on Distributed vs. Centralized Systems**
```
[EMP Event]
/ \
/ \
[Distributed Lines] [Centralized Node]
/ | \ |
[Line1][Line2][Line3] [Main Transformer]
\ | / |
[Substations] [Load]
Red lightning bolts: EMP surges.
Orange bursts: Potential damage points.
```
F. **Compare and Contrast Map: PG&E Grid vs. San Andreas Fault (Underground Crossovers)**
| Location | Grid Type | Fault Segment | Crossover/Proximity |
|-----------------|--------------|---------------|-----------------------------|
| San Francisco | Underground | Northern | Near Daly City, Peninsula |
| Marin County | Underground | Northern | Bolinas, Tomales Bay |
| Hollister | Underground | Central | Direct crossing |
| Carrizo Plain | Transmission | Southern | Crosses visible fault |
Visual Concept Map:
```
[PG&E Grid] ---------+
| Underground Lines |<---(Bay Area, Peninsula, Marin, Hollister)
+--------------------+
[San Andreas Fault]
```
**Conclusion**
The incident in question was not the result of any action or negligence on my part, but the predictable outcome of system vulnerabilities and external electromagnetic effects beyond my control, compounded by possible legal system manipulation. Mathematical, physical, and forensic evidence demonstrates:
- System configuration and condition dictate response to EMP/EMF and other events.
- Uncovered, layered EMP/EMF attacks scramble messages and data at the point of convergence.
- Even advanced forensic devices (black boxes) can be deceived or rendered unreliable.
- Infrastructure intersections with seismic faults heighten risk.
- Industry precedent, law enforcement protocols, and technical analysis support this conclusion.
- A covert group's manipulation of legal context and language further undermines justice.
I respectfully request this evidence be considered in your review and that I be cleared of any wrongdoing. Immediate, multidisciplinary review and oversight are essential to expose and stop these tactics.
Please see attached diagrams, references, and documentation. I am available for further discussion or clarification.
Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
**Attachments:**
- Diagrams and tables (as above)
- Technical and forensic references
- Maintenance logs or photos (if available)
#Z #PGEsafety #in!ui
For further technical detail, digital diagrams, or additional documentation, please contact me directly.
**Citations:**
- Documentation of the Fire Scene: A Legal Perspective - interFIRE.org
- NEW FIRE INVESTIGATION TECHNOLOGY AND TOOLS - Jensen Hughes
- A new accident analysis and investigation model for the complex - ScienceDirect
- Arson Investigation: Techniques, Evidence Collection, and Analysis - BlazeStack
- Fire Investigation Procedures: A Step-by-Step Guide - Fire Cash Buyer
- Advancing Fire Scene Investigations with Field Portable Technologies - ForensicCOE
- Fire Investigation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
- Fire investigation handbook - NIST Technical Series Publications
Willem Schalk my$tock er 🎯🤪
Mathematical Proof – EMP-Induced Voltage
V_induced = E_EMP × Length
If an EMP creates an electric field of 50,000 volts per meter over a 100-meter power line:
V_induced = 50,000 V/m × 100 m = 5,000,000 V
System Response Table
System State Event (Input) Output (Response) Example Outcome
Properly Maintained EMP, surge, wind System withstands event No fire, no damage
Degraded/Altered EMP, surge, wind Arcing, sparks, equipment fail Possible fire, damage
Rewired/Exposed EMP, surge Unpredictable, unsafe outcome Fire, misinterpreted signals
Information Pathway Diagram
text
[EMP Pulse]
v
--------------------------
| Metal Frame/Firebox | <-- (Partial Faraday cage)
| ------------------- |
| | Battery Pack | | <-- (EMP-resistant)
| | (with wiring) | |
| ------------------- |
| | Black Box | | <-- (Sensitive electronics)
--------------------------
(Wiring, sensors)
Red arrows: EMP induces voltage in wiring.
Blue burst: Black box receives corrupted or no data.
Order of Operations Analogy
(3 + 4)^2 × 2a = e
Proper order: a = e / 98
Altered order/configuration: Output can be incorrect or undefined
EMP Impact on Distributed vs. Centralized Systems
text
[EMP Event]
/ \
/ \
[Distributed Lines] [Centralized Node]
/ | \ |
[Line1][Line2][Line3] [Main Transformer]
\ | / |
[Substations] [Load]
Red lightning bolts: EMP surges.
Orange bursts: Potential damage points.
Compare and Contrast Map: PG&E Grid vs. San Andreas Fault (Underground Crossovers)
Location Grid Type Fault Segment Crossover/Proximity
San Francisco Underground Northern Near Daly City, Peninsula
Marin County Underground Northern Bolinas, Tomales Bay
Hollister Underground Central Direct crossing
Carrizo Plain Transmission Southern Crosses visible fault
text
[PG&E Grid] ---------+
| Underground Lines |<---(Bay Area, Peninsula, Marin, Hollister)
+-------------------+
[San Andreas Fault]
Subject: Comprehensive Technical and Investigative Evidence Regarding Fire Incident
To PG&E, FBI Bomb Squad, and Relevant Authorities,
This letter provides a unified account of technical, mathematical, and investigative evidence regarding the recent fire incident at the specified location or equipment. The evidence demonstrates, with scientific rigor and in line with established fire investigation protocols, that the incident resulted from system vulnerabilities and external electromagnetic effects-specifically electromagnetic pulse (EMP) events and infrastructure configuration-rather than any action or negligence by the undersigned.
My concern is for the safety of every citizen. I have inside information that there are explosives present which are being covered up because they do not appear to be explosives in a conventional sense. When rewired fire boxes are struck by EMPs, it essentially turns every fire alarm in range into an explosive device.
Given the potential for suspected explosive device involvement and the need for a multidisciplinary review, this information is respectfully submitted for review by all relevant investigative teams, including the FBI Bomb Squad and hazardous devices experts.
Summary of Evidence
System Configuration Determines Outcome:
The way electrical infrastructure is physically wired, maintained, and configured directly affects how signals and energy are interpreted and responded to by the system. Any changes from the original design-such as aging equipment, missing covers, improper rewiring, or exposed conductors-can drastically alter how the system responds to normal or abnormal events.
EMP and EMS Effects on Black Box Data Integrity:
When an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) or EMS (electromagnetic surge) strikes from above (such as from a high-altitude atmospheric event) and from below (such as ground-induced currents), it generates extremely fast and intense bursts of electromagnetic energy. Metal wiring and enclosures act like antennas, instantly converting these pulses into massive voltage spikes.
The black box, which records and processes electronic messages, relies on sensitive circuits to receive, store, and transmit data. These voltage spikes can overwhelm its protective circuits, causing the electronics inside to malfunction or fail. The effect is similar to static on a radio, but far more destructive: the data being recorded or transmitted is literally scrambled, corrupted, or erased in real time.
Because EMPs and EMSs can hit from both above and below, the black box is exposed to interference on all connected wires and surfaces. This simultaneous attack disrupts both the power and the data pathways, making it impossible for the black box to accurately receive or store messages-resulting in lost, jumbled, or unreadable records.
Fire Investigation Protocols:
Proper fire investigation relies on thorough documentation, including photographs, video evidence, floor plans, and written records. Advanced forensic techniques, such as 3D scanning, thermal imaging, and chemical analysis, are important for accurately reconstructing the fire's origin and progression.
Comparative Infrastructure Analysis:
The intersection of the PG&E grid with the San Andreas Fault, especially in areas where there are underground crossovers, increases the risk of both infrastructure and seismic failure occurring at the same time.
Technical Proof and Analogy:
Sudden changes in wiring or system configuration can make the system more vulnerable to EMPs and other surges. The same input can produce very different outcomes if the system is compromised.
Supporting Evidence (Text-Only)
Mathematical Proof:
When an EMP event happens, it can induce extremely high voltages along power lines. For example, if an EMP creates an electric field of 50,000 volts per meter over a 100-meter power line, the total induced voltage would be 5 million volts.
System Response Scenarios:
If the system is properly maintained, it can withstand events like EMPs, surges, or strong winds, resulting in no fire or damage.
If the system is degraded or altered, the same events can cause arcing, sparks, equipment failure, and possible fire or damage.
If the system is rewired or has exposed conductors, the outcomes become unpredictable and unsafe, including the risk of fire or misinterpreted signals.
Order of Operations Analogy:
Just as changing the order of operations in a math equation can produce the wrong result, changing the configuration of a power system can cause the same input to produce the wrong or even dangerous outcome.
EMP Impact on Different System Types:
Distributed systems (with many lines and substations) and centralized systems (with main transformers) can both be damaged by EMP events, but the points of failure may differ.
Comparison of Grid and Fault Lines:
Certain locations, such as San Francisco, Marin County, Hollister, and Carrizo Plain, have PG&E grid segments that cross or are very close to the San Andreas Fault, especially where lines are underground. These areas are at higher risk for combined electrical and seismic incidents.
Conclusion
The evidence shows the incident was not the result of any action or negligence by the undersigned, but rather the predictable outcome of system vulnerabilities and external electromagnetic effects. System configuration and condition dictate how the system responds to EMP and other events, and the information received by critical devices can be corrupted regardless of the input. Infrastructure intersections with seismic faults increase the risk. Industry precedent, law enforcement protocols, and technical analysis support this conclusion.
This evidence is submitted for review and consideration by all relevant agencies.
Attachments: Diagrams, tables, technical references, and documentation available upon request.
PG&E Headquarters: [https://www.pge.com/en.html][1]
PG&E: Pacific Gas & Electric Company