Besides Yamen (衙门, yámén) and the Judicial Court (大理寺, dàlǐ sì), there were several other public judicial buildings and institutions in ancient China. These buildings and offices served different roles in the judicial and administrative system, ensuring law and order across various levels of governance. Below are some examples of key judicial and public administrative buildings that played a role in maintaining the legal system:
1. Censorate (御史台, yùshǐ tái)
The Censorate was a high-level institution that served as a government watchdog, overseeing the conduct of officials, investigating corruption, and ensuring that justice was fairly administered. While not a public judicial building like a court, the Censorate had the authority to investigate judicial cases and report directly to the Emperor. Officials known as Censors (御史, yùshǐ) were stationed throughout the empire to inspect government offices and legal cases.
Function: Oversight and investigation of officials and their conduct.
Location: Present in both the central and regional governments.
Importance: The Censorate could intervene in legal matters, particularly cases involving corruption or abuses of power.
2. Autumn Court (秋审, qiūshěn)
The Autumn Court was a judicial review system where death penalty cases were reviewed annually, usually during autumn. High-level officials and judges would convene to review death sentences to ensure they were fair and justified.
Function: Review of capital punishment cases.
Location: Central and regional government offices.
Importance: Ensured fairness in capital cases, where the Emperor often had the final say.
3. The Court of Judicial Review (大理院, dàlǐ yuàn)
During certain periods, the Court of Judicial Review was an institution responsible for reviewing major judicial cases. This court acted as the final level of appeal before the Emperor and focused on revisiting important or controversial rulings from lower courts.
Function: Review of judicial cases, particularly complex or important ones.
Location: Typically located in the capital city.
Importance: Ensured proper application of the law in high-profile cases.
4. Prisons (监狱, jiānyù)
Prisons in ancient China were another key judicial building, where individuals were held before trial, after sentencing, or while awaiting punishment. Each yamen or judicial office typically had its own prison facility where suspects or convicted individuals were detained.
Function: Detention and holding of criminals.
Location: Attached to yamen or judicial courts.
Importance: A necessary part of the judicial system for enforcing legal penalties.
5. Ministry of Justice (刑部, xíngbù)
Though not a single building, the Ministry of Justice was an important government body overseeing law enforcement, criminal cases, and punishment. It functioned as the highest judicial authority after the Emperor, managing judicial courts, prisons, and legal matters throughout the empire. Judicial officials working under the Ministry of Justice often operated in regional offices and provincial capitals.
Function: Central authority for managing the legal system.
Location: Central government office, with regional branches.
Importance: The Ministry coordinated the entire judicial system of the empire.
6. Execution Grounds (法场, fǎchǎng)
Execution grounds, while not exactly judicial buildings, were public places where the ultimate punishments, such as beheading or strangling, were carried out. These were often located near major cities or yamen and were part of the legal process, particularly in cases involving capital punishment.
Function: Site for carrying out executions.
Location: Usually near judicial courts or city centers.
Importance: Served as a deterrent and a public symbol of justice.
7. Magistrate's Court (知府衙门, zhīfǔ yámén)
The Magistrate's Court, or Prefectural Office, served as the judicial center at the prefecture level. The magistrate (知府, zhīfǔ) was the highest-ranking official in a prefecture and had significant authority over judicial cases. His court often dealt with local disputes, crimes, and civil matters.
Function: Local judicial office handling civil and criminal cases.
Location: Prefectural capital cities.
Importance: The magistrate's court was often the first place people would go to seek justice.
8. Court of Appeals (覆审, fùshěn)
In some dynasties, there were Court of Appeals or Review Courts, where individuals could appeal judicial decisions made by local magistrates. These courts ensured that legal rulings were just and could overturn lower court rulings if they were found to be improper.
Function: Appellate court for reviewing lower court rulings.
Location: Often in larger administrative centers or capitals.
Importance: Gave citizens a higher level of recourse in the judicial system.
---
The Role of Yamen in Judicial Matters
The yamen (衙门, yámén) remained the most prominent judicial building at the local level, as it was the office where magistrates handled most legal cases. Citizens could report grievances, file lawsuits, and seek justice there. The yamen's structure and authority often made it the face of justice in ancient China, but it was supported by a range of other judicial and governmental institutions.
Judicial Offices in Larger Administrative Divisions
At larger administrative levels like kingdoms (王国, wángguó), commanderies (郡, jùn), and prefectures (州, zhōu), judicial offices often had similar functions to the yamen but with higher-ranking officials and broader authority. In these regions, courts might be called Judicial Courts or operate directly under regional officials such as governors, kings, or high magistrates. However, the basic structure of local governance and justice usually followed the same model, with judicial offices present at most levels.
Lower-Level Judicial Offices
At lower administrative levels, such as townships (乡, xiāng) and villages (村, cūn), formal judicial offices were rare. Disputes were often handled by local village elders or headmen, but serious cases would be referred to the yamen in the nearest county or prefecture.