Earlier, in the break room of Community 5.
The three players had just returned to the break room and almost immediately began to argue.
"It was all your lousy idea! Great, now the score for the first act is 10 points lower than other communities! 10 points!"
"Yeah, even if we abandon the previous strategy and perform normally in the second and third acts, this 10-point gap means we have to answer two more questions correctly than other communities to catch up! Are you trying to get us all killed?"
"You can't blame me! How could I have anticipated such a big score gap? Besides, when I proposed this strategy, didn't you all agree? Didn't you all think it was a great strategy? Now you're all pinning the blame on me alone!"
The two players were attacking the third player, but the player under attack wasn't willing to take the fall alone, and the three of them were in a heated argument.
This kind of quarrel clearly wouldn't lead to any results.
