When the storm finally truly arrived before people's eyes…
The instant the first thunderclap ripped through the air, right at their ears…
Everyone felt a shock, as if every pore on their bodies constricted at once.
No one anticipated that what they faced would turn out like this.
At that moment, everyone began to clearly realize that the scene unfolding before them…
…was incredibly complex, making it impossible to properly understand what was happening.
Everyone could immediately recognize that what they were seeing was actually like this.
So, in this situation, what kind of satisfactory and appropriate relationship should they have with the matter at hand?
Then make some kind of, after the fact, reaction that he might have about the problem that is worth understanding or responding to.
Will he, therefore, be destined in such a situation, to also no longer need to care about more recognition of the problem?
Right when he understood the situation he saw before his eyes, what it probably was.
To then make an answer about how he felt quite satisfied and correct in handling the problem, it seemed like it was already too late.
So at this moment, his preparation to recognize the problem, or rather, his clear understanding.
Should it also, at this moment, no longer need to have any other thoughts or preparations for recognition of the situation that could be accepted by others?
It is estimated that on the surface, understanding of the situation, or facing the matter, has no need to be recognized by too many people.
The situation he witnessed, the ending it meant, should be destined to have nothing at all at this moment, not too much of a development that could be recognized by others.
And for the problem at hand, there's something worth understanding, which means it's destined that at this moment, there's simply no need for any other uncertainties about the situation.
It's as if all the possible understandings and analyses of the situation, the discussions and interpretations, should find no other suitable responses in this circumstance.
Trying to change anything or to retreat at this moment…
…is no longer an acceptable ideal response.
And what kind of more ideal and suitable concern will people have to face the situation before their eyes next?
That kind of understanding and awareness of the problem will, therefore, in this scenario…
…no longer require any other uncertain judgments.
Perhaps a fitting explanation, or an understanding, and what seems like a more definitive analysis and consideration of the situation.
Therefore, in this outcome, it's also necessary to further understand the clearer and more satisfactory comprehension of the situation that's already presented before one's eyes.
What kind of preparation, seemingly more definitive, is there for acknowledging the problem?
What will bring a more satisfactory and appropriate explanation of the problem?
This will consequently allow oneself to have a rather good and satisfactory consideration, or clear understanding, of the situation that might arise next.
Subsequently, will it all be destined to no longer require any other doubts about the problem that one cannot ascertain at this moment?
Those considerations of understanding, or rather, recognition, of the problem.
And also, what is perceived as the most satisfactory and clear analysis of the situation being faced.
The subsequent thoughts will therefore no longer need any further hesitation about the problem that cannot be determined.
So, within this seemingly satisfactory and appropriate understanding of the situation…
Having arrived at what seems to be the most ideal understanding of the problem…
Will all other explanations regarding the problem, therefore, become unnecessary and no longer require further validation?
It seems the situation implied by the idea would, in such a circumstance, no longer require any accepted validation.
The witnessed outcome, the finally accepted appropriate understanding and clear recognition of the situation…
Judgment will, therefore, in this scenario, no longer need to consider those other uncertainties one might have about the problem.
So, one still needs to face the matter and arrive at an acceptable, rather good, and clear recognition of the problem.
This will, therefore, make one feel the most appropriate or ideal approach to understanding the situation.
So, would you no longer need those uncertain answers to questions that you, as an individual, couldn't find?
It's likely that this kind of understanding, and the preparation for analyzing or understanding the problem, would be enough.
Those other, seemingly more satisfactory, and appropriate understandings of the problem...
...would probably no longer require any further concern about the uncertainties of the issue.
All of the self-perceived most suitable understandings, or ways of dealing with the problem, would seem to be destined to no longer need any further logical development.
In that case, under these circumstances, any other person's seemingly more satisfactory and clear understanding of the situation...
...would also no longer require any further examination of the analysis or handling of the problem that others might accept.
That understanding, or consideration, would actually imply a certain outcome.
Everything will no longer need any further suitable handling under such circumstances.
The situation people see, the ultimate scenario that can be witnessed, has already undergone a change in the way things are handled.
Therefore, it's necessary to consider what kind of more satisfactory and rational actions to take regarding these matters.
A sufficiently clear understanding of the situation should also be maintained.
Could this make everything that follows seem to be the most appropriate way of understanding or dealing with the problem, no longer needing any other handling?
It's estimated that the results brought about by thoughts and considerations, the meaning of the reality presented before people's eyes.
The situation should probably, in this outcome, no longer need any other concerns about the problem that one cannot be certain of.
This is a way of understanding the problem that seems relatively satisfactory.
Further contemplation, therefore, is no longer necessary, resulting in a more satisfactory understanding or judgment of the problem.
Then it's simple; everything else that others might consider, which seems to be a more intuitive way of understanding the problem.
And those things that others can obtain, which seem to be a more satisfactory understanding of the situation, or a preparation for judgment.
Ultimately, what is derived can be the most detailed and clear recognition of the situation.
Will this not also become unnecessary under these circumstances, no longer requiring any other uncertain concerns?
Those thoughts and the understanding or contemplation of the problem, the results often become unnecessary to be concerned about anything else uncertain.
The outcome of the situation appears to be so simple, and the discussion should naturally become unnecessary under this outcome, no longer requiring any other uncertain concerns.
It's also necessary to once again face the matter, possessing a sufficiently clear and satisfactory explanation of the problem, or an ideal understanding.
That should allow for a more intuitive and clear understanding of the situation moving forward.
Therefore, there's often no need for a simplified explanation or answer to the problem.
Naturally, the consideration and satisfactory analysis, or understanding of the situation...
...should often mean that a more satisfactory acknowledgment of the situation is no longer needed at this time.
And a more intuitive understanding, or preparation for dealing with the situation, which seems to be more careful.
Other, more effective ways of dealing with the problem, or a clearer understanding, will basically no longer need to be ideally developed in such a scenario.
The scene he presented, the results he showed, seemed so simple at this moment.
After that, when facing the world again, what kind of clearer understanding of the problem will be needed?
That would allow for a more satisfactory preparation for understanding or acknowledging the problem.
Therefore, there would no longer be a need for a clearer analysis or understanding of the problem.
Considering everything it implies, it seems to be the most intuitive understanding of the problem.
Ultimately, the fairly good understanding of analyzing or handling the problem that one possesses.
In such circumstances, will often mean there is no longer a need for a more satisfactory ideal unfolding of the problem.
And what is witnessed seems to be such a simple and very good recognition of the problem.
It's necessary to further face what is seen before us, and bring about what kind of more intuitive preparation for understanding the problem.
This will allow others to generate a clearer analysis of the situation.
In such a situation, would there no longer be a need for that uncertain concern for the problem that other selves might have?
As if the action of knowing and the understanding born from facing the situation were one and the same.
The remaining preparations, therefore, should no longer require any other uncertain answers.
This is when the remaining preparations appear to be a more intuitive understanding, or perhaps recognition, of the problem.
Considering this, there will no longer be a need for subsequent uncertain and satisfactory responses to the problem.
Thus, the following is a more appropriate explanation of some very good understanding of the problem.
What remains appears to be a more satisfactory way of objectively understanding and handling the situation.
The resulting outcome will, therefore, be destined to become, in this situation, something that no longer requires a clearer unfolding of the understanding of the problem.
The situation I observed was rather satisfying, producing a clear understanding of the problem, and any hesitation was thus unnecessary.
Within this seemingly straightforward comprehension of the issue…
What other preparations will bring about a more satisfactory and clear understanding in this scenario?
Naturally, recognition and understanding, or preparation for action…
In such circumstances, there is no need for uncertain, inappropriate suspicions.
The witnessed circumstances provide a clearer explanation of the problem and a satisfactory analysis of the situation.
Further explanations and preparations should, at this point, no longer require a more direct understanding of the problem.
Therefore, what further appropriate concern is needed when facing the accuracy of what is witnessed?
Then, let's consider some other ideas that seem more satisfactory, a kind of taken-for-granted understanding of the problem that appears more appropriate.
Basically, this will make it fundamentally unnecessary to have a more pure understanding of the problem, or an ideal response.
And this, ultimately, is the answer, the reality that everyone must accept, the undeniable truth presented before their eyes.