Note to Readers:
All historical information in this chapter is well-documented and factual; you are encouraged to research and verify every date and name mentioned. The interpretation of these facts is my personal intellectual endeavor, but the historical events remain for you to see and judge for yourselves.
Before we begin, I have a quick question...
Hey, you, the atheist over there! What happened in the kitchen?
Did a balanced ecosystem emerge from the pot, or was it just an explosion?
Hello? Are you there? Did you die, or what?
Oh, you're alive? Fine. What happened to the cooking pot? It exploded and injured you? And the kitchen is ruined? Your mother is going to kill you for that mess.
Now, let's get back to dismantling the absurd theories of Darwin.
Today's topic might be the hardest for you to accept, but I sincerely ask you to read until the end, because the matter is truly strange and illogical.
And that matter is... [DINOSAURS]
The Bone of Contradiction: From Giant Humans to Prehistoric Monsters
In 1676, Robert Plot discovered a giant femur bone. He believed it belonged to giant humans. Somehow, this news spread across the world, and instead of calling him crazy, people were fascinated—even though it was an era of wars that shouldn't have left time for such trivial stories.
Years passed, and more fossils were "found," until we reached the year... 1824.
William Buckland, an English geologist and priest, was known for his bizarre obsession with eating every type of animal (rumor has it he even ate the mummified heart of King Louis XIV). In that year, Buckland coined the term [Megalosaurus] for fossils found in Oxfordshire. This was the first "scientific" description before the official term "Dinosaur" existed.
In his book Reliquiae Diluvianae, he tried to link these fossils to Noah's Flood. Despite his eccentricity, he leaned toward a religious explanation. But suddenly, under mysterious pressure from the "Scientific Community," he shifted toward the "Deep Time" or "Ancient Earth" hypothesis.
Question 1: Why did the scientific community pressure him to delete the religious hypothesis in favor of the materialist one?
In 1842,
Richard Owen, the famous English anatomist known as the "British Cuvier," coined the term [Dinosauria]. Before him, they were just called "Megalosaurus" or other random names. Owen founded the Natural History Museum in London. He had a fierce rivalry with Darwin, not because he was a priest, but because he believed in "Archetypes" designed by a Creator. However, he was eventually swept away by the materialist wave hitting Europe at the time.
But do you honestly think these men (Plot, Buckland, and Owen) were working alone in quiet labs?
The truth is that behind every bone in every museum, there were golden threads pulled by fingers that hate the light. Between 1780 and 1880, while the world was boiling with wars, a Triangle of Power was rewriting Earth's history:
* The Red Dynasty: They gripped the banks of Europe and funded the major expeditions and museums.
* The Oil Family: In the New World, they seized control of educational curricula and forced "Darwinism" as a mandatory dogma in schools to ensure generations were raised believing they were just a "material accident."
* The Secret Order: Emerging in 1717, its members occupied the seats of the British Royal Society, and they were the ones who crafted the complex Latin terminology to give a "fake prestige" to the dinosaur myth.
Do you believe in coincidences? Fine, look at this "normal" coincidence in the dates:
* Year 1824 (The first announcement): Sum of digits (1+8+2+4 = 15), reduced (1+5 = \mathbf{6}).
* Year 1842 (The official naming): Sum of digits (1+8+4+2 = 15), reduced (1+5 = \mathbf{6}).
Do you notice the repetition of the number 6? The number of "Matter" in their codes.
But it gets darker: The time gap between the announcement (1824) and the official naming (1842) is exactly 18 years.
And eighteen is nothing more than three sixes added together (6+
6+
6).
Of course, this is just a "random coincidence" with no symbolic meaning at all... right?
Anyway, dear reader, let's move on.
They say dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago because of an asteroid. They say not a single dinosaur survived.
But wait... now they tell us the Chicken is the descendant of the T-Rex!
This raises two questions:
First: How can the size and biology of a terrifying monster evolve into a chicken? Even in the so-called laws of evolution, there are biological limits that prevent "Macro-evolution" from turning a giant armored killing machine into a farm bird that lays eggs. They aren't selling you science; they are selling you a Disney movie funded by the Oil Family.
Second: Didn't they say dinosaurs—especially the T-Rex—went completely extinct? How did it evolve while it was dead? Was [Sung Jin-woo] there to perform an "Arise" and summon their shadows?
I am still looking for a logical explanation for this absurd nonsense.
They say dinosaurs only appeared to us in the 17th century. Fine... but how was there not a single hint of these creatures before then?
Is it possible the Egyptians, who carved solid granite and dug the Nile canals, never found a Spinosaurus bone while building the pyramids?
Is it possible the Chinese farmers, who cast bronze and plowed that massive land for 5,000 years, never saw a thing?
Is it possible the Greeks, who mastered anatomy and dissection, never stumbled upon a single femur?
Here is an interesting historical irony:
While there is no mention of dinosaurs in any ancient civilization, there is a concept of a creature far more mysterious—The Dragon.
The Dragon appeared in China, Babylon, Egypt (Apophis and Ammut), and Greece (Typhon and the Hydra).
Does it make sense that these civilizations, which imagined such complex creatures, couldn't find a single dinosaur bone and imagine its shape? Was their imagination so "weak" that they couldn't draw a Triceratops with its three clear horns, yet they could draw a seven-headed Hydra?
Did the Chinese build a Wall thousands of miles long and see nothing for 5,000 years? Did the Greeks build astronomical clocks and rule half the world without finding a single fossil pit? Did the Egyptians build the greatest architectural marvel in history, yet tripped over dust and missed a two-meter-long dinosaur leg?
The bitter truth, my friend, is that they didn't find bones; they found a "void" in people's minds and filled it with plaster monsters. The Secret Order replaced the ancient legends of the spirit with modern legends of the imagination, all to expel the idea of a "Creator" and plant the seeds of "Coincidence."
They didn't discover a lost history; they invented a plastic past to control your spiritual future. They took the wings off the ancient dragon, turned it into a lizard statue, and called it a "Dinosaur"—all to convince you that you are a cosmic accident, a descendant of a beast that ended up as a meal.
But remember: a lie remains a lie, even if it is guarded by the Red Dynasty, funded by the Oil Family, and hidden behind the masks of the Secret Order.
The scale of truth is still in your hands.