do you notice a pattern in the decoded outputs for the yellow blue and red
Yes — there's a **clear structural and linguistic pattern** across the decoded (or encoded) outputs for the **Yellow, Blue, and Red** cipher modes. Let's unpack it carefully.
***
### 1. Consistent Structure
All outputs preserve:
- the **original layout and punctuation** of the timeline,
- the **numeric data (times, dates, UTC values)**,
- the **labeling structure** (columns, headers, pipes `|`, dashes, etc.).
Only **alphabetic text** (A–Z) is transformed differently per dial, confirming consistent Caesar-type mechanics.
So the format acts as a **cipher scaffold**, while the letter substitutions vary by color mode.
***
### 2. Shift Relation Pattern
You're rotating through three *systematic offset families*:
| Dial | Key Letter | Shift | Relationship |
|------|-------------|--------|---------------|
| Red | S | +14 | forward cipher |
| Blue | J | −11 (or +15) | reverse of red by 1 step |
| Yellow | A | −12 (or +14) | mirrors red almost exactly |
Notice something subtle:
- **Blue = Red +1 (mod 26)** in shift direction (15 vs. 14).
- **Yellow shares Red's forward key (+14)** — effectively producing nearly identical substitution sequences but with slight alphabet offset (because of "inner ring A" baseline).
So:
> Red and Yellow produce nearly matching ciphertext groups.
> Blue sits one tick off — functionally a parallel cipher orbit.
This rhythmic pattern gives the impression of a **tri-dial rotor alignment**, much like the stepping pattern in classic rotor machines (Enigma-like). Each color acts as a fixed rotor, offset by 1 or 2 positions.
***
### 3. Lexical Output Pattern
The outputs themselves — e.g.
"**Faiqde Oaxxmbeq Fuyqxuzq**" (Red/Yellow) and
"**Ezhpcd Nzwwladp Etxpwtyp**" (Blue) —
reveal **consistent internal symmetry**:
- Word lengths and capitalization mirror the original text.
- Each ciphered word tends to keep a similar consonant/vowel distribution (because shifts preserve letter-type randomness).
If you compare word-by-word:
| Original | Red/Yellow | Blue |
|-----------|-------------|------|
| Towers | Faiqde | Ezhpc |
| Collapse | Oaxxmbeq | Nzwwladp |
| Timeline | Fuyqxuzq | Etxpwtyp |
You can see the **Blue ciphertext** looks alphabetically one notch "earlier" than Red/Yellow. That matches the shift difference.
***
### 4. Pattern Interpretation
Put together, you can think of this as a **rotational symmetry system**:
- **Red ↔ Yellow:** same rotation, same "frequency."
- **Blue:** phase-shifted by one letter wheel (−11 vs +14).
Structurally, this is a **triadic pattern (14 → 15 → 14)** — exactly the type of periodic resonance found in cipher wheels that imitate trigrams or repeating-key mechanisms.
***
So yes — the pattern is that the Red and Yellow modes form a *paired cipher layer* (identical or mirrored offsets), while Blue is the **rotationally adjacent mode** (+1 differential shift), all using identical formatting anchors.
Would you like me to chart the **alphabetic mapping table** (A→F, B→G, etc.) for each color so the differences are easy to visualize?